Caution! We test, We Twitter, Those Sweet Old G'ma Days? Over!

Looking for a little common sense amongst all those pompous, blow hard media types?
You got it!

Sunday, August 09, 2009

The Las Vegas Sun incites the Birthers-again!

Obama needs to show his birth certificate
Owen Nelson, Las Vegas
Thursday, Aug. 6, 2009 | 2:01 a.m.

Are you ready for another round of craziness? This comment in the Las Vegas Sun on President Obama's birth certificate brought out all the colors again-and of course, staying on topic is optional.
I swear, the Las Vegas Sun prints the starter story just to mess with us. Must have been a slow day..Don't forget to look for the clincher comment in every LV Sun comment list(the leave it if you don't like it..kind of like, Where's Waldo!)


The column by The Washington Post’s Eugene Robinson in Tuesday’s Sun makes the claim that “No reason exists for taking ‘birthers’ seriously.” Remarkably, he supports his claim with a falsehood.

He tells us that state officials in Hawaii have produced Obama’s birth certificate. What they produced was a “Certificate of Live Birth,” something quite different from a birth certificate. Perhaps Mr. Robinson should answer this question: If Obama has nothing to hide, why does he not voluntarily release his real birth certificate?

DISCUSSION: 78 comments so far…

By indythinker
8/6/09 at 6:25 a.m.
Suggest removal
I've asked that question a dozen times and I have been told everything from "I wouldn't either to it's none of my business." Frankly, I disagree.

By AgMallard
8/6/09 at 6:37 a.m.
Suggest removal
Dude let it go. Or is this hard as does our leagally elected President represent a moment in history you are threatened by? First non-white guy. These stupid myths are simply a proxi for race as is the whole Muslim thing.

By mschaffer
8/6/09 at 6:42 a.m.
Suggest removal
Why is the Sun wasting everyone's time printing this cranks letter? Are they reminding us that a portion of our population has mental illness?
Given the number of times President Obama has had to prove citizenship in the past (ever try to attend college indythinker???) you nuts need to get a life.

By SgtRock
8/6/09 at 7:10 a.m.
Suggest removal
At least nobody made the claim that Obama orchestrated a terrorist act on US soil or knew about it before hand and did nothing.

God forbid that any crazed dumb nuts would make such claims.

By DouglasDemocrat
8/6/09 at 7:29 a.m.
Suggest removal
"God forbid that any crazed dumb nuts would make such claims."

Hey, those "dumb nuts" are just that - DUMB. And I don't care which side they're on.

Did the Bush Administration fall asleep on the job? Yes - they got a intelligence memo titled "Bin Laden Determined To Strike In U.S." and pretty well ignored it. Even the 9/11 Commission called them on that.

But to claim that they knew the specific target or had a hand in it? Come on, that's another one of those conspiracy theories that would require thousands of people with absolutely no leaks.

Just like this one - a certificate of live birth is, for all intents and purposes, a birth certificate.

But I'll tell you what - you call up the state records office for whatever state you were born in and ask them to send you a copy of your original birth certificate. See what kind of response you get.

By JohnF
8/6/09 at 8:33 a.m.
Suggest removal
Would Mr. Nelson care to explain what the difference is between a birth certificate and a certificate of live birth?

When I sent away to the state of Connecticut for a copy of my birth certificate a few years back, they sent me a "certificate of birth." If that is not the same thing as a birth certificate, how can I prove that I am indeed an American citizen?

Fortunately, the State Department agreed that the document was proof of citizenship and I was issued my passport. I wonder if they'd give me the passport today now that Mr. Nelson has told them I didn't really provide proof of citizenship?

Birther morons.

By Teaser
8/6/09 at 8:34 a.m.
Suggest removal
It was in the best interests of the Bush/Cheney administration to get McCain elected. Are you telling me that they - in charge of all intelligence agencies at the time (not to mention any connections still held by Bush Sr.) - would not have jumped at the chance to discredit Obama's birth status? It would have been the fastest, easiest solution to their problem.

By Jay Brice
8/6/09 at 8:36 a.m.
Suggest removal
This is to Owen Nelson:

Okay, what IS the significant distinction between a "birth certificate" and a "certificate of live birth" in Hawaii? Seems like a distinction without a difference to me.

By scott.swank
8/6/09 at 9:06 a.m.
Suggest removal
You blithering idiot. A "certificate of live birth" is what Hawaii calls a birth certificate.

http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/...

By rumrunner
8/6/09 at 9:22 a.m.
Suggest removal
If Obooma wants to end all this its as simple as him just pulling it out shutting them up?Whats he really got to hide???

By DouglasDemocrat
8/6/09 at 9:32 a.m.
Suggest removal
rumrunner, he's already "pulled it out". Factcheck.org and World Net Daily both have personally inspected it and decalred it authentic. Both the Governor of Hawaii and the Director of Hawaii Department of Health have stated they have the original on file and it is authentic as well.

What more is needed? An 8mm film of his mother giving birth while Don Ho sings "Tiny Bubbles" in the background?

By FROMNYC2LV
8/6/09 at 9:40 a.m.
Suggest removal
Many states have changed the format on BCs. When I was born they took a picture of a "chalkboard" where all my info had been written in on. My original copy has a raised seal. Requesting a copy today, I'd get a "cert of live birth" on a generic form on a blue background with ONLY my parents names, my name and dob on it. My original has my dr, the nurse, hospital and serveral other pieces of info.

By SgtRock
8/6/09 at 9:54 a.m.
Suggest removal
"But I'll tell you what - you call up the state records office for whatever state you were born in and ask them to send you a copy of your original birth certificate. "

I have a copy of my original birth certificate (they keep images of the original) from North Carolina.

In fact, the only legal form of a North Carolina birth certificate is a copy of the image of original birth certificate.

In 2001, Hawaii decided to destory all the original copies of the birth certificates. Now, they just print a form that is off a database. The original signatures by the parent(s) and the doctor are gone as well as other information that was put on the form but not carried over to the database.

I think the newspaper listing of his birth is good proof that he was born in Hawaii.

He probably has a copy of the original birth certificate. He has chosen not to release that or even say if he has one.

He also has choosen not release his records from Columbia even though he has released them from Harvard.

What is he hiding about Columbia?

By DouglasDemocrat
8/6/09 at 10:07 a.m.
Suggest removal
"What is he hiding about Columbia?"

What's John McCain hiding about his time at the Naval Academy?

See, I can play this game too.

By henderson
8/6/09 at 10:14 a.m.
Suggest removal
Doug brings me to another point,

Al Quada attacked us or our interests at least 5 times, with another 3 attempts during Clinton's administration. Clinton also was offered Bin Laden by the Saudis and he refused, allowing him to go to Afghanistan and plot 9/11. 9/11 took years of planning, yet everyone wants to blame Bush who had only been in office 7 1/2 months. Obama has been in office 6 months now, when do you think he'll quit blaming Bush for everything?

Obama obviously doesn't care to make this right, or he would have presented his birth certificate already.

By mschaffer
8/6/09 at 10:31 a.m.
Suggest removal
Hi DouglasDemocrat,
I just got the biggest laugh out of your Don Ho "Tinny Bubbles" comment and appreciate that you have given the cranks all the respect they deserve.
Thank you!

By mschaffer
8/6/09 at 10:33 a.m.
Suggest removal
henderson,
The story about the Saudis and Bin Laden is just that, a story told by conservatives to shift blame from Bush the Incompetent to President Clinton.
You will sway no one that doesn't already believe this nonsensical story so give it up.

By SgtRock
8/6/09 at 10:45 a.m.
Suggest removal
"What's John McCain hiding about his time at the Naval Academy?

See, I can play this game too."

Both man if they want to be the leader of the USA should release all college records.

By henderson
8/6/09 at 10:53 a.m.
Suggest removal
mschafer, I'm not sure what story you're talking about.

By stevem
8/6/09 at 10:59 a.m.
Suggest removal
the people that keep pushing this issue are to the right what the 9/11 people are to the left.

both just make their "cause" look moronic.

why WOULD obama release it?

the longer he goes without showing it, the longer he can make these people...and the conservative movement look like freaks.

DROP IT ALREADY!

By mschaffer
8/6/09 at 11:02 a.m.
Suggest removal
henderson,
Your post above alluded to the supposed fact that the Saudis offered Bin Laden to Clinton but this was nonsense.

By crackedbeak
8/6/09 at 11:08 a.m.
Suggest removal
I just figured out why henderson wears the tinfoil hat, to conceal her hood. The birthers are not interested in a certificate, they just can't handle that we have a black man as President. It used to be you had to go down to the park to find the brain damage brigade, standing on their soapbox spouting their bile and hate. Now it's on every channel and every computer screen. The shrub was still blaming Clinton policies in October of 2006, two years into his second term. Distract and distort is the mantra of the right wing, do as we say not as we do. Look forward to beating your pants off in 2010.

By mikegino
8/6/09 at 11:15 a.m.
Suggest removal
Answer: Because its in Kenya!

By henderson
8/6/09 at 11:23 a.m.
Suggest removal
Even if you are right, Clinton had 8 years to capture or stop Bin Laden, who had struck at least 5 times.

Yet George Bush who had been in office just 7 1/2 months, was supposed to capture or stop Bin Laden from carrying out an attack that was being planned for years.

It's a very ironic double standard you have.

By rumrunner
8/6/09 at 11:26 a.m.
Suggest removal
If he has produced anything,than why is it still comeing up?Im neither repooplican,nor democrap,but i saw through this man before he even took office! Just look at whom he put into his cabinet,and whom is really running this country! Uncle Harry,and aunt Polosi are gonna run us right into world laughter!!!

By mschaffer
8/6/09 at 11:28 a.m.
Suggest removal
Bush and his appointees ignored and shunted aside Richard Clarke. Not only did they not listen to him they were incompetent about running the government in general.
Apparently, after 9/11 Bush the Incompetent lost interest in Bin Laden while playing with the shiny toy known as Iraq.
The first attack on WTC was prosecuted effectively by the Clinton Administration.
Now name each of the five attacks and let's explore what was or was not done.

By DouglasDemocrat
8/6/09 at 11:41 a.m.
Suggest removal
"If he has produced anything,than why is it still comeing up?"

Because apparently a document that was good enough for him (or any other citizen) to get a U.S. Passport, or enroll in college, isn't good enough.

By Auslander
8/6/09 at 11:47 a.m.
Suggest removal
Obama has already admitted that he was born on the planet Krypton. What could be more powerful than this voluntary admission?

By mikegino
8/6/09 at 12:26 p.m.
Suggest removal
Because its in Kenya with the rest of his hardly working family!

Is the planet Krypton in the same Galaxy as Kolab?

I don't know about the rest of you, but I'm glad he's out there looking out for us. No, I don't meam Obuma...I mean Jeff Lebowski, the Dude!

By henderson
8/6/09 at 1:11 p.m.
Suggest removal
mschaffer,

I don't need to name each of Al Quaeda's attacks, the the information is widely available. Look them up you lazy slob.

Typical liberal, "do everything for me."

By mschaffer
8/6/09 at 1:47 p.m.
Suggest removal
henderson,
You are a typical name calling conservative who makes accusations and refuses to back it up with data. YOU made the claim regarding the attacks, YOU show the evidence.

By henderson
8/6/09 at 2:39 p.m.
Suggest removal
Now I'm "claiming" Al Qaeda attacked us before 9/11? It is a well known fact. Are you seriously telling me that you are unaware of this?

I also "claim" the Earth is round. I also "claim" the ocean is deep. I also "claim" the sky is blue.

By gmag39
8/6/09 at 2:52 p.m.
Suggest removal
Did you know all birthers are from Uranus?

By LasVegasRocks
8/6/09 at 3:03 p.m.
Suggest removal
Until each and every "birther" has:
* seen
* touched
* smelled
* heard read to them ('cuz I don't believe "birthers" can read)
and
* tasted (yep, tasted)
Obama's birth certificate, they will not be satisfied.

"Birthers" are the best antidote to the return of republicans.

By dipstick
8/6/09 at 3:04 p.m.
Suggest removal
in reading these threads i can safely assume that the vegas heat is starting to affect you guys; go ahead, turn on the air conditioner to 'high' and for crying out loud 'chill out'!

By mschaffer
8/6/09 at 4 p.m.
Suggest removal
henderson,
I have not disputed that there were attacks pre 9/11. You claimed there were five attacks prior to 9/11. Detail them.

By henderson
8/6/09 at 4:49 p.m.
Suggest removal
12/1992: a bomb went off at the Gold Mohur hotel, where U.S. troops had been staying while en-route to Somalia, though the troops had already left when the bomb exploded. The bombers targeted a second hotel, the Aden Movenpick, where they believed American troops might also be staying. That bomb detonated prematurely

2/1993: Bombing of World Trade Center;

10/1993: Killing of U.S. soldiers in Somalia.

6/1996: Truck bomb explodes outside Khobar Towers military complex in Saudi Arabia; 19 American servicemen killed, hundreds of others injured.

8/1998: Bombing of U.S. embassies in East Africa; 224 killed

10/2000: Bombing of the USS Cole in port in Yemen; 17 U.S. sailors killed.

I put this together in a hurry. There are also a ton of failed attacks or thwarted attacks during this span. I don't believe this is even a full list.

By getalife
8/6/09 at 5:55 p.m.
Suggest removal
OK, let me try a to inject a little sanity into this conflagration.

I did not vote for this Obama character and have posted many times my disdain for him and his ilk, but "birthers", let it go. You are starting to look like you all took the small bus to school and your ignorance is showing.

What is next? The moon is really made of cheese. Is there really a secret coded message that spells CHANGE but actually in xygorkin means armagedden.

As for you Gmag, I think I blew a snot bubble I laughed so hard.

By indythinker
8/6/09 at 6:12 p.m.
Suggest removal
mshaffer: "Given the number of times President Obama has had to prove citizenship in the past (ever try to attend college indythinker???) you nuts need to get a life."

Gee thanks for that!!! Been to college and graduated not once, but twice, working on a third time. So yes, I can read and think for myself and amazingly, ask questions once in a while.

Furthermore, I have to wonder about who isn't interested in what "their" president did while in college or law school or whatever! He runs the damn country...it's our right to know whether you agree or not. And, with all his campaign BS...excuse me, rhetoric....about transparency, I think it is questionable that he WON'T release any records. But, of course the liberal left is so desperate for "change" they're selling their souls to the Devil and don't even realize it.

By gmag39
8/6/09 at 6:27 p.m.
Suggest removal
'pologize for that, getalife.

By GordonShumway
8/6/09 at 8:09 p.m.
Suggest removal
indythinker: I don't know what dark secrets you're looking for in Obama's educational history. It looks pretty impressive to me but probably you see it as getting a free ride via entitlement programs for black people.

Following high school, he moved to Los Angeles in 1979 to attend Occidental College. After two years he transferred in 1981 to Columbia University in New York City, where he majored in political science with a specialization in international relations and graduated with a B.A. in 1983.
Obama entered Harvard Law School in late 1988. He was selected as an editor of the Harvard Law Review at the end of his first year, and president of the journal in his second year. He graduated with a Juris Doctor (J.D.) magna cum laude from Harvard in 1991. Obama's election as the first black president of the Harvard Law Review gained national media attention.
I guess you would like a notarized copy of his grades? It doesn't compare to Sarah Palins educational accomplishments but you can't have everything.

By mschaffer
8/6/09 at 11:57 p.m.
Suggest removal
Now henderson,
Given that the blind sheik is now in prison for the 93 bombing prove Bin Laden was behind that attack.
For a more nuanced view of reality here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Qaeda#19...

By mschaffer
8/7/09 at 12:18 a.m.
Suggest removal
indythinker,
You went to college? It doesn't show at all!

By indythinker
8/7/09 at 6:10 a.m.
Suggest removal
"indythinker,
You went to college? It doesn't show at all!"

Because I CHOOSE to decide for myself? Unlike the "liberal elite...(notice I didn't include you mschaffer because I am of the opinion that just being a b*tch doesn't necessarily gift YOU with intelligence.) You and the Pelosi's of the world can "kiss my grits."

That's the beauty of this country isn't it? You can ask questions freely without fear of retribution aside from some small-minded bloggers like yourself who think their opinion is the only opinion. Can I tell you...you are WRONG! You have missed the point again. WHY?

Why don't you take your BS in Liberal Womens Studies like a good little follower and shove it...right after removing your head. Judging by your constipated attitude, there's room for nothing more. Two can play your nasty game although you are MUCH better at it than I.

And, Gordon...I can read just fine and could cut and paste exactly as you have. Forgive me for NOT taking your word or anyone elses at face value anymore. I'd like to see with my own two eyes thank you very much!

By henderson
8/7/09 at 6:57 a.m.
Suggest removal
12/1992: a bomb went off at the Gold Mohur hotel
10/1993: Killing of U.S. soldiers in Somalia.
6/1996: Truck bomb explodes outside Khobar Towers
8/1998: Bombing of U.S. embassies in East Africa; 224 killed
10/2000: Bombing of the USS Cole

There, I took that one off the list for you. What did Clinton do in 8 years? Yet Bush should have solved the problem in 7 months?

By Van Guard
8/7/09 at 7:48 a.m.
Suggest removal
Actually, I think the earth is more oval than round. Yes, the ocean is deep, but it can be shallow in spots. And I'm not so sure the sky is blue, but it appears that way to the eye. Outside of that, henderson does make a few valid points.

By mschaffer
8/7/09 at 7:54 a.m.
Suggest removal
I am amused that indythinker thinks I am a woman. Shows the quality of thinking going on there clearly.
henderson,
President Bush didn't solve the problem in eight years much less 7 months. You wouldn't understand what President Clinton was doing so why bother.
You know there is a whole history of terrorism earlier than 1992 you seem to have left out...I wonder why?

By indythinker
8/7/09 at 7:56 a.m.
Suggest removal
Keep it up guys.... Sometimes I feel like it's a useless battle the way these liberal's parade around in all their "unjustified" superiority.

And sometimes when I read things like this... I feel like there is still hope for the America that we all know and love...despite her many faults.

"Hawaii state Sen. Will Espero, a Democrat, has confirmed plans to introduce legislation through which the state's lawmakers would force the public disclosure of all President Obama's birth documents held by the Hawaii Department of Health, including President Obama's long-form original birth certificate."

By LV4LIFE
8/7/09 at 8:01 a.m.
Suggest removal
What a bunch of clowns! Get over it! Your guy lost and nothing you can do or say will change that. Some people are like pit bulls, they lock their jaws into something and never let go until you shoot them in the head.

By lvmachead
8/7/09 at 8:11 a.m.
Suggest removal
You people made my day. I needed a good laugh.

By mschaffer
8/7/09 at 8:25 a.m.
Suggest removal
indythinker=University of Phoenix?

By indythinker
8/7/09 at 8:26 a.m.
Suggest removal
"I am amused that indythinker thinks I am a woman. Shows the quality of thinking going on there clearly."

Was going off an earlier post from ages ago... if I'm wrong...oops! Please reinsert correct word from my earlier post...

By indythinker
8/7/09 at 8:29 a.m.
Suggest removal
mshaffer=University of the Eternally Sad, Rejected and Pathetic?

By LV4LIFE
8/7/09 at 8:31 a.m.
Suggest removal
Ha, ha! Indythinker= Clown college. Sorry, couldn't resist joining in on the fun.

By indythinker
8/7/09 at 8:32 a.m.
Suggest removal
"What a bunch of clowns! Get over it! Your guy lost and nothing you can do or say will change that. Some people are like pit bulls, they lock their jaws into something and never let go until you shoot them in the head."

Our guy didn't lose...we had no guy!

A country filled with 300 million Americans and the best we could do was an over the hill, out-of-touch ex-POW, or a junior senator without experience, a questionable voting record,and questionable personal acquaintances...

Right...

By indythinker
8/7/09 at 8:41 a.m.
Suggest removal
lV4life: you should have tried harder...to resist that is.

By henderson
8/7/09 at 10:10 a.m.
Suggest removal
I didn't go back further than that because my point was that Bush was supposed to stop Al Qaeda in 7 months when Clinton did nothing in 8 years. So it's been about 6 months of Obama, it's almost time to stop whining about Bush.

In 6 months Obama has passed the "stimulus", Cash for Clunkers, extended mortgage credit, put together a plan for socialized medicine, passed crap & tax, and quadrupled the deficit.

I realize this gives you libs great joy, but he spent more time mulling over what dog to get his kids than he did on any one of these important decisions.

Obama can't continue to blame Bush, he may have inherited a bad economy, but he needs to take responsibility for the changes he's made, the money he's spending, and whether or not his policies work. This economy is his now.

By indythinker
8/7/09 at 10:18 a.m.
Suggest removal
Henderson...you will never win this arguement with these "highly enlightened" people. Gotta hand to you for trying though!

By LV4LIFE
8/7/09 at 10:21 a.m.
Suggest removal
AAAh Spank me and call me Palin! 2012 You betcha!

By vegasstudent
8/7/09 at 10:33 a.m.
Suggest removal
Owen's letter would be funny if it weren't so pathetic. Yes, someone posted fake birth announcements in Hawaii those many years ago just hoping that baby would grow up and be able claim U.S. citizenship and become President. Right. And now the state of Hawaii Department of Public Records is in on the deal verifying the live birth in Hawaii. What a plot - just ingenious.

By edgewise
8/7/09 at 11:52 a.m.
Suggest removal
Here's a thought: why don't the birthers prove that Obama's mom was in Kenya during his supposed birth there? Where's the travel documents, the plane tickets, proof of her visit?

They have nothing, just wacky paranoia.

By jaesun
8/7/09 at 2:12 p.m.
Suggest removal
the people blaming bush for not doing anything about 9/11 have as much clout as those people blaming obama for the current economy.

Bush got the memo about the attack and didn't do anything to prevent it
==
Obama knew that the economy was going bad and didn't do anything to prevent it

and mschaffer, obama won't fix terrorism in 8 years ever. no president will.

and any conspiracy theorists out there who would think the Gov't did it themselves or had a hand in it, LOL@You

And yes, this whole Birther movement or whatever it is, is retarded. and Yes, I am a Republican

By mschaffer
8/7/09 at 3:42 p.m.
Suggest removal
jaesun,
Given that terrorism has been around since the dawn of civilization I never thought any president could solve it.
henderson,
the fight in Somalia in 93 had nothing to do with Bin Laden.

By formervegas76
8/7/09 at 3:58 p.m.
Suggest removal
right on mschaffer- don't waste your time with loonies like by buddy henderson. henderson, we'll never agree but have a great weekend.

By henderson
8/7/09 at 4:50 p.m.
Suggest removal
mschaffer, you are incorrect.

By dipstick
8/7/09 at 7:57 p.m.
Suggest removal
now its easy to see why vegas is underwater.

By getalife
8/7/09 at 8:39 p.m.
Suggest removal
mschaffer, the fight in Somalia had everything to do with Bin Laden and Al Queda. I know you will want proof because your lazy arrogant self can only shoot barbs; yet cannot figure out how to use google. Amazing!

You were too busy worrying about stupid things like man made global warming or whatever BS you thought back then.

For someone who regularly tears down conservatives you really are quite the drama queen; maybe that is why henderson was confused.

By lisa80268
8/7/09 at 8:55 p.m.
Suggest removal
OMG--you people are soooo STUPID! STUPID! CRAZY! I wish I could leave this pitiful country. I'm embarrassed to walk among you idiots.

By JahReb
8/8/09 at 1:38 a.m.
Suggest removal
getalife, you seem to be the village expert. Explain to us uninformed ones about the relationaship between Arbusto and Binladen Oil????

And who was that Einstein that traded Sammy Sosa about 500+ home runs before he became Sammy Sosa again?

See...two can play the stupid, 2nd grade gotcha game.

By caroleejam
8/8/09 at 7:53 a.m.
Suggest removal
If you really ask yourself, "Why am I wanting to see a birth certificate all of a sudden?" The answer has to be, "Because that's what a huge crowd of people are also doing this week".

No name calling necessary to see this.

By getalife
8/8/09 at 1:20 p.m.
Suggest removal
JahReb, so are you denying that Al Queda received huge amounts of money from Bin Laden?

Here is an excellent tip that will help you in life; Do not compare funding terrorism to trading baseball players, unless of course you are equating taking steroids to a form of domestic terrorism.

I believe you use the phrase; stay classy.

By mschaffer
8/8/09 at 3:41 p.m.
Suggest removal
henderson,
I might be incorrect about Somalia although the sources for his involvement in that Bush Sr. inspired debacle are shaky.

By qwill
8/9/09 at 7:39 a.m.
Suggest removal
Why would they want to find/kill Bin Laden? If they did then they would no longer have a reason for staying in Afgan/Iraq.

By henderson
8/9/09 at 8:06 a.m.
Suggest removal
mschaffer,

Not to beat a dead horse, but you've still given no explanation as to how George Bush should have prevented 9/11 after just 7 months in office, when Clinton had 8 years, multiple attacks, and did nothing.

By henderson
8/9/09 at 9:38 a.m.
Suggest removal
lisa,

No need to "wish you could leave or be embarrassed" any longer.

It's still a free country, meaning you're free to leave if you hate it so much.

Happy travels.

By cnev
8/9/09 at 6:30 p.m.
Suggest removal
Ahh!The "free to leave" mantra.
What a perfect ending to these comments! Thanks for the great laughs!
I just love Las Vegans-
do it again, Sun-do it again!

Saturday, August 08, 2009

The Suckers behind the Angry White Men


As a social worker in grad school I studied many child development theories.
Watching the "Tea Parties", the "protests" over health care and the angry white men interviewed on television, with red faces, shouting, indignant, one theory sticks in my mind.

Expect a negative behavior to increase before it is extinguished when you set boundaries with a young child.

A child exhibits a behavior you want to stop. You say no and remove the child from the behavior. The child will inevitably return to do it again. Often times it will become a power struggle.
The answer is to divert the child. The child may return to the spot and the behavior at a later date and the same process is repeated. Eventually the behavior s diminished and eradicated.

The angry white men in congress are in the last throes of their petulant, spoiled little boy behaviors.

The behaviors are increasing and exacerbating.
For example;
"You have some splainin to do"-totally unacceptable and racist behavior on the part of an educated, grown man. A grown up should have removed him from the situation-

The "Tea Parties"-look around. Angry white men with signs during the worst economic times in our lives-protesting taxes which have not been raised.
The temper tantrum is someone else has the ball and they don't like it. Interrupt the game by calling names and diverting attention.

The insanity of it all has me shaking my head in wonder.. The oldest primitive responses in behavioral science are played out for all to see and no one sees them.

President Obama's birth certificate elicits crazy behavior. For those who want to believe no amount of proof will satisfy them. Who carries this message forward? Who encourages this behavior? The same angry old white men who, behind the scenes, tap into that two year old boy behavior-no one can make me change-I won't do it-I won't do it!"

Ironically, this is the legacy of the Baby Boomer generation.
Look around you. Health Care Corporations, Insurance companies, oil and energy companies, utilities, Wall Street, banks, mortgage companies-all owned or run by angry white men in their sixties.
Who are the talking heads for the angry white man being told no? Rush Limbaugh, Lou Dobbs, Bill O'Reilly, Glen Beck, -check out their ages..
News media? Owned and run by many of the Baby Boomer generation.
Government? Look at those having the temper tantrums?

Makes one wonder if the Baby Boomers sincerity of the sixties-for equal rights, desegregation, equal pay and free speech weren't really just throwing big temper tantrums because they could.

Now the Generation of Baby Boomer males fight the dirty fight.
Why?
Because they think they can get away with it, once again.








Las Vegas homeless meets the NY Times


Las Vegas Wash Homeless

(New York Times description of above picture)
Some of the Las Vegas homeless resort to living in a maze of underground flood channels beneath the Strip. There they face flash floods, disease, black widows and dank, pitch-dark conditions, but some tunnel dwellers say life there is better than being harassed and threatened by assailants and the police.


Las Vegas is never far from the minds of reporters. Sadly, it is a microcosm of traits the rest of the country would rather not own up to.
Historically the city liked to hide the homeless. It is bad for the image. Tourists don't want to come here to lose money from tight slots machines only to see the results of compulsive gambling on the streets.
Recently a man shot himself in front of the Las Vegas sign.
Pretty symbolic.
Homeless living in the washes is nothing new-in fact it has been an address for the homeless for many years. You can follow the path of the homeless by following the empty shopping carts from the side of the road to the wash. Homeless individuals use them to carry their belongings.

While my son was attending school in Las Vegas for EMT training he worked at a take out pizza place next to a wash. At night when he cleaned up, he would save the leftover pizzas and rather than throw them out place them in a box and leave them on the top of the dumpster. The homeless men who lived in the wash would come up and retrieve them.

One day the police came to the store asking him questions.
Later he told me about it-tearfully. Someone had murdered them.
It never made the paper and no one was arrested.







Tuesday, August 04, 2009

What's So Great About Private Health Insurance?

Nichael Hiltzik Los Angeles Times


What's so great about private health insurance?

The bloody battle in Congress over a 'public option' ignores the insurers' role in creating the nation's healthcare crisis and their efforts to throttle reform.
Michael Hiltzik
August 3, 2009
Throughout the heroic struggle in Congress to provide a "public option" in health insurance, one question never seems to get answered: Why are we so intent on protecting the private option?

The "public option," as followers of the debate know, is a government-sponsored health plan that would be available as an alternative to, and in competition with, the for-profit health insurance industry, otherwise known as the private option.

    On Friday, the House Committee on Energy and Commerce narrowly passed a reform bill incorporating a public option resembling Medicare. It was a bloody fight among members of Congress, some of whom believe that the public option will give the government unwarranted power over healthcare, and all of whom enjoy government-provided healthcare that's a lot better than what most of us get.

    But the battle is just beginning. After the committee vote, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi warned that the health insurance industry will conduct a "shock and awe" campaign to kill the public option when Congress returns from vacation in September and starts debating the measure. We can expect to be overwhelmed with an industry ad campaign worth millions of dollars (remember Harry and Louise?) exhorting us to write our lawmakers to preserve the American way of healthcare.

    So it's proper to remind ourselves what that American way entails. For if the insurers have proved anything over the last 15 years as the health crisis has gathered speed like an avalanche roaring downhill, it's that they're part of the problem, not the solution.

    The firms take billions of dollars out of the U.S. healthcare wallet as profits, while imposing enormous administrative costs on doctors, hospitals, employers and patients. They've introduced complexity into the system at every level. Your doctor has to fight them to get approval for the treatment he or she thinks is best for you. Your hospital has to fight them for approval for every day you're laid up. Then they have to fight them to get their bills paid, and you do too.

    One Wendell Potter reminded a Senate committee in June that health insurance executives had assured Congress in 1993 that they would work to secure universal medical coverage and end denials of coverage to people with pre-existing conditions. Then they moved heaven and earth to kill reform.

    They've made the same promises now, Potter observed. But they're in an even better position to throttle reform. Mergers and acquisitions have turned the industry into a cartel of huge corporations.

    "The industry is bigger, richer and stronger, and it has a much tighter grip on our healthcare system," he said. The last thing they want is a government program set up as their competition.

    Potter knows the insurers' ways because he was a top executive in the industry for 20 years. But the hard numbers bear him out. The two largest insurers, WellPoint and UnitedHealth Group, each acquired 11 other insurers between 2000 and 2007. They now control a total of 67 million "covered lives" (that's customers in health insurance-speak).

    This consolidation has produced functional monopolies in communities across America. The American Medical Assn. (itself no great fan of reform) found in a 2007 survey that in 76% of the country, defined as its major metropolitan statistical areas, one insurer had a share of 50% or more of the conventional insurance market. This phenomenon gives the companies enormous power to drive up premiums and maximize profits.

    Why do we tolerate this? The industry loves to promote surveys indicating that most Americans are "satisfied" with their current health insurance -- 37% are "very satisfied" and 17% "extremely satisfied," according to one such study.

    Yet these figures are misleading. Most people are satisfied with their current insurance because most people never have a complex encounter with the health insurance bureaucracy. Medical care generally follows the so-called 80-20 statistical pattern -- 20% of patients consume 80% of care. If your typical encounter is an annual checkup or treatment of the kids' sniffles, or even a serious but routine condition such as a heart attack, your experience is probably satisfactory.

    But it's on the margins where the challenges exist. Anyone whose condition is even slightly out of the ordinary knows the sinking feeling of entering health insurance hell -- pre-authorizations, denials, appeals, and days, weeks, even months wasted waiting for resolution.

    And that's among people with affordable employer-paid insurance, an ever-shrinking cohort. The percentage of small and medium-sized businesses offering health coverage to employees shriveled to 38% from 67% between 1995 and 2008, according to the National Small Business Assn. Without reform, the number will continue to plummet.

    Meanwhile, people employed by big companies that offer a health plan are within a layoff notice of losing coverage for themselves or their families, joining America's 46 million uninsured.

    Their only alternative right now is the individual market, where insurers scrutinize applicants' medical histories, looking for reasons to turn them down or charge them exorbitant premiums. Have hay fever, asthma, a cholesterol pill prescription? Are you a woman of child-bearing age? You're virtually uninsurable at an affordable cost.

    Even if you're accepted, your carrier reserves the right to cancel your policy retroactively if it finds that you left even a tiny condition from years back off your application.

    The public option may be your lifeline -- if it's enacted.

    Signs of the industry's mobilization against the public option are everywhere. I don't claim clairvoyance for having predicted this development back in March; given the industry's record on reform, a child could have done so.

    You've heard of the Blue Dog Democrats, those mostly rural conservatives who blocked a summertime vote on reform legislation on Capitol Hill? According to the Center for Public Integrity, the biggest backer of the Blue Dogs’ political action committee is the healthcare industry, which is on the path to pumping a total of $1.2 million into the PAC's maw in the current 2009-10 election cycle.

    Then there's the advocacy group called the Campaign for an American Solution, which describes itself as "a grass-roots effort . . . to build support for workable healthcare reform." The organization owns up to being an "initiative" of America’s Health Insurance Plans, or AHIP, the industry's chief lobbying arm. Unless I've missed a radical change in lawn and garden horticulture, you can't get much further from the grass roots than to be a creation of the industry with the biggest stake in the debate.

    Despite all this, America's health insurance plans, which helped create our dysfunctional world, are deferred to as though they're a disinterested party. AHIP subtitled one of its policy papers "A Vision for Reform." But are the insurers now, and have they ever been, anything other than a roadblock?

    Michael Hiltzik's column appears Mondays and Thursdays. Reach him atmichael.hiltzik@latimes.com, read previous columns at www.latimes.com/hiltzik, and follow @latimeshiltzik on Twitter


    Monday, August 03, 2009

    Goldman Sachs, Wall Street Banks-Lesson Learned






    We aren't out of the woods yet. But Goldman Sachs is. After giving them millions in bailout money amidst the loss of millions of jobs, they made 3.5 billion last quarter and are planning huge bonus comps.
    Bank of America isn't out of the wood yet.
    Neither are a few others.

    Did we learn our lesson yet?
    Since we bailed out the very same arrogant out of touch Wall Street elites and all we got was a tee shirt with holes-and unemployment

    make sure you start screaming loudly when the next one steps up with hands out

    What did we learn boys and girls?

    Sunday, August 02, 2009

    Can you turn off your brain anymore?


    Sometimes I think life could be lived simpler if our thoughts didn't always dog us.
    Our culture creates and depends on noise to validate existence.
    TV's, videos, music, radios, Ipods, cell phones, send all that noise into our heads.
    I can't help thinking all that continuous noise impacts our brains in a negative way.
    Silence has become rare-in fact, it has become an almost deliberate and forced activity.

    If quiet time for our brains is not a value how do you think that impacts our culture?
    Or individually?
    Do we lose the ability to create our own thoughts?
    Is there some deeper part of our brains that over time, we are shutting down by not using it?
    If so, is it meant to be- as some kind of evolutionary change which will support our survival over time or is the lack of silence and independent thought the downfall of us?



    Saturday, August 01, 2009

    Why The Haves No Longer Sustain the Economy


    Yesterday' s news didn't surprise us. News reports this week reveal the average worker has lost wages in the past ten years. NY Times report upscale brands are now offering sales once considered "exclusive" fo top tier customers to the average buyer on the street.
    Sale of luxury items such as private jets, yachts and auction sales are down. Las Vegas resorts once demanding 250.00 plus nightly room rates are advertising side by side with the junket hotels offering deep discounts.

    While the "rich" may have the majority of the income it stands to reason they have to earn or sustain it. It is a little like a pyramid scheme. Stockholders demand profit. Businesses need customers.
    Where does all this buying power initiate? You can sell at the top for a limited time.
    When workers no longer have buying power, the system topples.
    Continue the layoffs, pare the staff, double the workload-cut benefits-succeed at increasing the immediate short term profit to make stockholders happy and in the long run-the top loses.

    Our economic model is dependant on both consumers and shareholders.
    When shareholders greed transcends consumers sustenance, the model fails.

    The "Haves" might want to remember they depend on the "Have Nots" for their riches.
    Americans are quite resourceful.
    As resentment builds, fear and distrust of government and big business grows, Americans will find ways to sustain themselves without the forced and monopolistic business pressures.

    More people grow vegetables. Consignment shops, flea markets and garage sales are first contacts for buyers. Free and Share Internet sites grow.
    Craiglist grows because buyers and sellers work the old market model-it only sells for what what someone will pay-or it doesn't sell. Unrealistic prices are lowered regularly.
    Beanie Babies and Tickle Me Elmo would not sell for overinflated prices in today's economy.
    Even the technologically futuristic phones of today no longer have waiting lists. Buyers want a phone that works, for a fair price. Period.
    You don't see people camped out the night before a new game, phone or video enters the store.
    Who cares?

    The Haves may sustain their "Haves" but at some point, like the stupidity and greed of the market, eventually it implodes on itself, because it needs the "Have Nots" to sustain the model.

    Today the "Have Nots" are truly the have nots.
    They will survive and knowing American history, they will not only survive but invent, create and define new methods to survive-but the Haves may regret it.